About this Violation
- If you have been accused of sedition, see [SEDITION].
- If you have been accused of defamation, see [SLAPPs].
- If you have been illegally arrested or detained see [ILLEGAL ARREST/ DETENTION].
Human Right defenders face increased criminalisation and judicialisation that aims to intimidate them and silence them.
Criminalisation is the use of “legal frameworks, strategies and political and legal actions with the intention of treating [the defence, promotion and protection of human rights] as illegitimate and illegal.”
For example, a human rights defender might be repeatedly accused and prosecuted on wrongful charges. In addition, their rights during trial might not be respected.
The Constitution of Sri Lanka safeguards fair trial rights and includes protections against judicialisation and criminalisation.
Namely, the Constitution guarantees:
A businessperson might be involved with your wrongful prosecution either because he/she was the person prosecuting you or because they gave false information to the authorities that led to your prosecution.
When a businessperson has committed any of those offences against you, you can file a criminal case against them or a civil lawsuit for tort.
If you want to bring to court, the business entity, you can choose to initiate a civil lawsuit for delict against the entity for the crime committed against you. The company as an entity, might also be civilly liable for the abuses carried out by its directors.
You cannot seek criminal remedies against the business entity. This is because Section 10 of the Penal Code explains that persons that incur criminal liability under that code, include not only natural persons but also "any company or association or body of persons, whether incorporated or not." The Code of Criminal Procedure also regulates how a corporation should appear before the Courts and how it should be served documents, seemingly presuming that a corporation can be brought before Criminal Courts. However, in practice, business entities are only brought before civil and labour courts.
Note that the Bail Act foresees also anticipatory bail. If you are likely to be arrested and detained, you have the option to apply for anticipatory bail, before the Magistrate having jurisdiction over your residence. The Magistrate will give direction that in the event of your arrest on the allegation that you are suspected of having committed, or been concerned in the commission of an offence, you should be released on bail.
If a business actor has abused your rights you cannot file a fundamental rights litigation with the Supreme Court against that business actor. However, you can file a fundamental rights litigation making the State liable for inaction in preventing violations of fundamental rights by the non-State actor, namely the business.
Warning: Before taking any of the steps listed below, you can strategically assess the risks involved with taking certain actions and make sure that you prioritise your physical and psychological safety and security.
If you have been wrongfully prosecuted, there are several rights that you have during your trial.
If you are already arrested and detained, you can ask for bail by the police, namely, to be released on condition that you appear at the Court whenever you are required to.
Note that not all offences are bailable. Bail can be asked for less serious offences. The Officer in Charge of a police station must grant bail for bailable offences, if you are prepared to furnish a bail bond. In contrast, more serious offences are non-bailable. For those offences, bail cannot be granted if there is evidence that the person could be found guilty of an offence punishable by death or life imprisonment. However, in a few cases, persons charged with non-bailable offences might be granted bail.
The Bail Act foresees anticipatory bail. If you are likely to be arrested and detained, you have the option to apply for anticipatory bail, before the Magistrate having jurisdiction over your residence. The Magistrate will give direction that in the event of your arrest on the allegation that you are suspected of having committed, or been concerned in the commission of an offence, you should be released on bail.
If after your arrest and detention, you are convicted on charges that you consider wrongful, you should resort to a higher court for the purpose of obtaining a review and reversal of the lower court’s judgement, by filing an appeal. The appeal should be filed to the Court of Appeals within fourteen days from the judgment of the first instance court.
According to section 17 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, when the Court acquits you because it deems that the charges against you were frivolous or vexatious, it has the power to order the person who accused you to pay you compensation for your loss of time, income and the expenses you made during being arrested.
Beyond the tools that you can use during your criminal case, you can consider initiating a separate criminal case against the businessperson who wrongfully instituted proceedings against you or provided wrong information to the authorities. Their wrongful conduct might fall under the scope of Sections 75, 180 and 188- 208 of the Penal Code, which punish obstruction of justice by wrongfully initiating criminal cases and making false statements against you. More specifically, section 208 prohibits anyone from instituting any criminal proceeding against you, or falsely charging you of an offence, knowing that there is no just or lawful ground for such proceeding or charge against you.
If the businessperson committed any of the offences above, you should consider reporting the incident to the authorities. This can be done by:
The responsibility for the offence against you lies with the person who perpetrated it. Beyond the specific person that threatened, intimidated or harassed you, the company director might also be liable, if he/she knew what was happening and did not take measures to avoid it.
The police will investigate your case and arrest the suspect, once they identify them. The case will then go to trial stage. The court will hear the prosecution’s case, examine the accused and allow him to present their case. Then, it will make its judgment, either convicting the accused, if the case was proven beyond reasonable doubt or acquitting him/her for lack of evidence. The burden of proving the case lies with the prosecutor.
If you are not satisfied with the outcome of the trial, you can resort to a higher court for the purpose of obtaining a review and reversal of the lower court’s judgement, by filing an appeal. The appeal should be filed to the Court of Appeals within fourteen days from the judgment of the first instance court.
Under article 17 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Court may order the person convicted, to pay compensation to the person affected.
Moreover, if the court orders the perpetrator to pay a fine as a form of punishment, then part of that fine can be given as compensation to the victim.
At the time of awarding compensation in any subsequent civil suit relating to the same matter, the court shall take into account any sum paid or recovered as compensation in the criminal trial.
If you are tortured during detention, see [VIOLENCE & TORTURE] section.
Warning: Before taking any of the steps listed below, you can strategically assess the risks involved with taking certain actions and make sure that you prioritise your physical and psychological safety and security.
If you have been wrongfully prosecuted, there are several rights that you have during your trial.
According to section 17 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, when the Court acquits you because it deems that the charges against you were frivolous or vexatious, it has the power to order the person who accused you to pay you compensation for your loss of time, income and the expenses you made during being arrested.
If you are already arrested and detained, you can ask for bail by the police, namely, to be released on condition that you appear at the Court whenever you are required to.
Note that not all offences are bailable. Bail can be asked for less serious offences. The Officer in Charge of a police station must grant bail for bailable offences, if you are prepared to furnish a bail bond. In contrast, more serious offences are non-bailable. For those offences, bail cannot be granted if there is evidence that the person could be found guilty of an offence punishable by death or life imprisonment. However, in a few cases, persons charged with non-bailable offences might be granted bail.
The Bail Act foresees anticipatory bail. If you are likely to be arrested and detained, you have the option to apply for anticipatory bail, before the Magistrate having jurisdiction over your residence. The Magistrate will give direction that in the event of your arrest on the allegation that you are suspected of having committed, or been concerned in the commission of an offence, you should be released on bail.
If after your arrest and detention, you are convicted on charges that you consider wrongful, you should resort to a higher court for the purpose of obtaining a review and reversal of the lower court’s judgement, by filing an appeal. The appeal should be filed to the Court of Appeals within fourteen days from the judgment of the first instance court.
If an administrative authority, a state official or a court, carry out an act, issue a decision or omit to do so, which somehow influences your human rights protection during your trial, you can consider filing a writ petition. Those petitions can be filed, when you want to ask the court to issue an order directing lower courts or authorities to do something or stop them from doing something. For example, after you are arrested and detained, and in order to address the wrongful proceedings instituted against you, you can file a writ petition before the competent higher Court, under Articles 140 and 154P (4) (b) of the Constitution, asking the higher court to quash the arrest warrant against you or to correct any similar unfairness in your case.
Another option is to file a habeas corpus petition and ask the Court to assess the legality of your arrest or detention.
Depending on the specific circumstances of your case, you might choose to file one of the following writs:
Depending on which petition you will file, you can ask the court to order the performance of duty, to quash other authorities’ orders, to prohibit lower courts from doing something. You can also ask the court to grant interim relief in the form of a stay order. The Court will order it if it appears that the refusal of the interim order would render the final order nugatory if the petitioner is successful.
You can choose to file your writ petition to:
The two courts have concurrent jurisdiction, which means that they both have the power and competence to hear the case!
If you have suffered harm due to your wrongful prosecution, you can consider initiating a civil lawsuit for delict to ask compensation from the businessperson, who initiated that prosecution or gave wrong information to the authorities.
In case of wrongful prosecution, you can file for the delict of malicious prosecution. However, note that you can file a lawsuit for that delict, after the criminal case against you has ended in your favour. Other prerequisites, in order for your case to be successful include:
If someone (person or entity) has committed a wrong against you, then you can file a lawsuit for delict. Sri Lankan law does not explicitly recognise class actions. However, under section 16 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , parties who have a common interest in bringing or defending an action can do so with permission of the court and must provide notice of the action to all relevant persons.
You can direct your claim against the businessperson who wronged you. Also, depending on the circumstances, you might be able to bring a civil case for tort against the business entity. Companies can be held liable for torts committed by their agents or servants, when the tort is committed in the course of doing an act which is within the scope of the powers of companies.
You should file the lawsuit at the District Court of your jurisdiction. In order to try your case, the court should have territorial and pecuniary jurisdiction and no other court should have exclusive jurisdiction.
Time limit: You should file civil suits within two years from the time when the cause of action has arisen.
Your case will be acceptable if you demonstrate the following elements:
The court can award the following remedies:
If you are aggrieved by the decision of the court, you can file an appeal to the Court of Appeals. Before filing an appeal, you should ask the court its ‘leave’ to file an appeal and convince it that the matter involves a substantial question of law or is a matter fit for review by the Court.
In order to file a civil case, you will have to pay the lawyers’ fees as well as stamp duty for every document tendered to the Court according to the value of the claim.
Warning: Before taking any of the steps listed below, you can strategically assess the risks involved with taking certain actions and make sure that you prioritise your physical and psychological safety and security.
As a human rights defender, you might be wrongfully prosecuted, leading as such to a severe restriction of your fair trial rights and your right to liberty and security. You can therefore consider approaching the Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka (HRCSL), even if it was a businessperson or business entity involved in your wrongful prosecution. The Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka is responsible for investigating human rights complaints and promoting human rights protection.
Primarily, you can report human rights violations by state officials and state agencies. However, the HRCSL interprets their mandate broadly and include business induced violations in their work.
You and your lawyer. The law also allows ‘any interested party’ to file a complaint.
You can lodge your complaint in person, sent by post, by email, by fax or by giving information through the HRCSL hotline. For more technical information, see here.
The commission has the power to investigate and recommend compensation. However, it cannot enforce its recommendations. After an allegation is proven to the satisfaction of the commission, the HRCSL may recommend financial compensation for victims, refer the case for administrative disciplinary action or to the attorney general for prosecution, or both.
If you belong to the Vedda indigenous population and you have been wrongfully prosecuted by a businessperson, you can consider informing the Wannietto trust. The Trust was created by the Presidential Cabinet order "to protect and nurture Veddha Wannietto culture." By informing them about your case, you will not receive a remedy, but they can potentially offer precious advice on how to achieve redress. Importantly, by informing the Trust, and having your case registered, you will have proof of the attack, in case the situation escalates in the future.
If you are a woman human rights defender, and you have been wrongfully prosecuted by a businessperson, you can consider approaching the National Commission on Women, under the administration of the Ministry of Women, Child Affairs and Social Empowerment. The Commission has the power to investigate complaints of violations of the rights of women and gender discrimination and refer them to a governmental and civil society organisation for redress, legal aid and/or mediation services.
Note that there is a Women Help Line 1938. For more information you can check this website.
The Department of Labour has established a complaint mechanism where you can file any sort of complaint in relation to your employment, by the private or public sector. You can use that mechanism when your employer has filed a SLAPP against you.
You can lodge your complaint online here.
You can also find a detailed list of potential complaints and how they are resolved here.
To grow, expand or simply operate, corporate entities often borrow funds from financial institutions, including private banks, investment funds, development banks or export credit agencies.
Sometimes, those financial institutions have put human rights standards in place and expect that they are respected by their borrowers. In practice, this means that if a business borrows money from them, then it should respect human rights standards, as required by those entities. To monitor compliance against those standards, several financial institutions have developed complaints mechanisms where you can report if a business, funded by them, is violating your rights.
After a complaint is filed those mechanisms usually ask the respective business to take measures to mitigate and prevent further harm.
Note also that those mechanisms can guarantee confidentiality, under certain circumstances. In addition, the Compliance Advisor Ombudsman of the World Bank has established an “Approach to Responding to Concerns of Threats and Incidents of Reprisals in CAO Operations”. For more information see here.
Therefore, if a business is violating your rights, you should check whether it is funded by an institution that has in place a grievance mechanism of this kind.
Below you can find a non-exhaustive list of grievance mechanisms by funding institutions.
The Equator Principles are a financial industry standard for environmental and social risk management in high-value projects funded by private banks. A financial institution committing to the Equator Principles should respect the standards and report publicly on their implementation.
The Equator Principles usually cannot be used as a legal basis for legal remedies but have been widely relied on for advocacy purposes.
In addition, depending on the bank, it might be the case that the bank which is funding your project has put in place a grievance mechanism or a whistle-blower policy. On that basis, you should first acquire information on who the lender of the company that is violating your rights is. You should then find out whether that bank has any mechanism in place, as well as guidelines on how to approach it.
You should be cautious and protect yourself from potential retaliation by asking for confidentiality if this is provided.
The Green Climate Fund was established in 2010 by 194 states, parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). It aims to support investments in low-emission and climate-resilient projects and programs in developing countries. It provides investment to “accredited entities” such as public institutions, development or commercial banks, or private companies that implement climate-resilient projects.
It has in place a grievance mechanism called the Independent Redress Mechanism (IRM).
Click here to watch an explanatory video on Youtube.
Any person or a group of persons, or a community that has been or may be affected negatively by a GCF project or programme may file a complaint.
A complaint with the IRM can be filed by:
For more information, visit the IRM’s website.
If the company that has harmed you, works for a project which is financed by the International Development Association (‘IDA’) or the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (‘IBRD’), both of which form the “World Bank.”
To approach the Inspection Panel, the project should have harmed you or be likely to harm you or the environment in a direct and material way.
Complaints can be submitted by “any group of two or more people in the country where the Bank financed project is located who believe that, as a result of the Bank’s abuse of its policies and procedures, their rights or interests have been, or are likely to be adversely affected in a direct and material way.”
Note than one individual alone cannot submit a complaint, but an organisation or group of individuals can!
You should send your request to by post to:
The Inspection Panel 1818 H Street,
NW Mail Stop: MC10-1007
Washington, DC 20433
USA
Or by email to ipanel@worldbank.org.
The suggested format for a request for inspection can be found at www.worldbank.org.
The Inspection Panel will not provide any remedy but will facilitate the dispute resolution between the parties.
The Compliance Advisor Ombudsman hears complaints regarding projects supported by the International Finance Corporation (IFC) or Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA), where those projects have direct social or environmental impact.
Any individual or group of individuals who has suffered, or are likely to suffer, direct social or environmental impact by a project supported by the IFC or MIGA. Someone representing the people harmed can file a complaint on their behalf, provided he/she has authorisation.
Your complaint should include your name and contact address. Note that you can ask for the process to be carried out confidentially.
You should describe the project, the harm it has caused to you or the environment and the performance standards that have been violated.
You can submit your complaint by post to:
Office of the Compliance Advisor/Ombudsman (CAO)
2121 Pennsylvania Avenue,
NW Washington, DC 20433,
USA Tel: + 1 202 458 1973
Fax: + 1 202 522 7400
Or by e-mail to: CAO@worldbankgroup.org.
🡪 Note also that the CAO has established an “Approach to Responding to Concerns of Threats and Incidents of Reprisals in CAO Operations.” For more information see here.
The CAO will investigate your case and mediate the dispute between you and/or project-affected communities and companies and will aim to address any environmental and social concerns. It will further monitor how the IFC and MIGA are complying with the applicable Performance Standards in relation to social and environmental risks.
If your social or environmental rights have been abused by a business financed by the European Investment Bank (EIB).
Any individuals or organisation that are concerned with an EIB supported project. The complainant is not obliged to demonstrate that they are directly affected or that the policies are being violated by the specific project.
In your complaint you should:
You should send by post to
European Investment Bank Secretary General
100 boulevard Konrad Adenauer
L-2950 Luxembourg
Or by email to complaints@eib.org
Or online.
The Complaints Mechanism will investigate if your complaint is well-founded and will attempt to facilitate resolution of the dispute. If it concludes that there was maladministration by the EIB, it might propose corrective or mitigation actions and recommendations or determine that the problem was solved during the complaints handling process and that no further action is required.
If you are not satisfied, you can file an appeal with the EIB Complaints Mechanism or with the European Ombudsman.
Where you have suffered harm because a project supported by the EBRD did not respect the bank’s commitments to environmental and social responsibility.
Individuals and civil society organisations who believe they are directly and personally affected by an EBRD Project.
You should send it to IPAM's secure, encrypted online Request Form, available on the IPAM website. In certain circumstances, IPAM can also consider complaints submitted by civil society organisations that are not directly or personally affected. These will be assessed on a case-by-case basis.
EBRD Independent Project Accountability Mechanism
Attn: Victoria Marquez-Mees, Chief Accountability Officer
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
One Exchange Square
London EC2A 2JN
United Kingdom
Or by email to ipam@ebrd.com.
The IPAM will first attempt to achieve an agreement between you and the company that takes part in the project. It might also issue recommendations for the project and monitor their implementation. In addition, the IPAM also assesses the Bank’s compliance with its own policies, if the EBRD is found to be non-compliant, IPAM will propose changes to the project and the Bank’s procedures to address the non-compliance.
Any group of two or more people or a local representative of affected people, who are directly, materially, and adversely affected by a project supported by the ADB, including regarding the environment, involuntary resettlement, and indigenous peoples.
A sample complaint form is available at www.adb.org.
You should send your complaint by post to:
Complaints Receiving Officer
Asian Development Bank (ADB)
6 ADB Avenue Mandaluyong City
1550 Philippines
or by email to amcro@adb.org.
The respective department will conduct an assessment and attempt to bring together the disputing parties. If an agreement is reached, the Mechanism will monitor its implementation. The Mechanism might also provide the ADB’s management with recommendations for remedial actions.
The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) has established a complaints mechanism, called Project-Affected People’s Mechanism (PPM).
A complaint can be filed by people affected by an AIIB funded project and who believe they have been, or are likely to be, adversely affected by AIIB’s failure to implement and comply with its Environmental and Social Policy (ESP) during the due diligence stage of the project, project preparation or during AIIB’s oversight of the project. This mechanism should be used when concerns cannot be addressed satisfactorily through any project-level grievance redress mechanisms or AIIB Management’s processes.
Two or more Project-affected people (Requestors) may file a submission. Requestors may also authorise an in-country representative (Authorised Representative) to file a submission on their behalf. This representative may be a relative, trusted individual or organisation. Note that you can request that the process is carried out confidentially!
You can file a complaint online here. You can find a form here.
The PPM might mediate a dispute by engaging the parties in dialogue, information sharing and joint fact finding. It might also recommend to the Bank’s management adequate measures in relation to environmental and social issues arising out of its funded projects.
Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC) and Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) share a complaints process called “Objection Procedures based on Environmental Guidelines”. The process is handled by the Office of the Examiner for Environmental Guidelines.
When a project funded by JBIC or JICA is causing or is likely to cause substantial damage due to non-compliance with the Environmental Guidelines.
A complaint/request can be filed by two or more residents of the host country who have suffered actual and direct damage, or who are highly likely to suffer damage in the future by the project in question. The request can also be filed by an authorised representative.
Contact Information
Examiners for the Guidelines
Secretariat of The Examiner for the Guidelines
Japan International Cooperation Agency
Nibancho Center Building
5-25, Niban-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 102-8012, Japan
FAX: +81-03-5226-6973
E-mail: jicama-jigi@jica.go.jp
You can find more information as well as a sample request here.
The examiner will investigate the case and will attempt to encourage dialogue between the parties. He might also recommend possible measures to cure non-compliance issues to the Executive Committee of JBIC.
Export Credit Agencies (ECAs) are institutions established by different states, with the aim of providing financial support to companies operating abroad. By way of illustration, the UK has the Export Credits Guarantee Department, France has the French Development Agency, the Netherlands has the Netherlands Development Finance Company (FMO), and so on. Some of those agencies have established grievance mechanisms, which you could resort to if a business funded by them, is abusing your human rights. The main function of those mechanisms is to restore dialogue between disputing parties in relation to environmental and social concerns stemming from the projects they fund.
The AFD has established an accountability mechanism called Environmental and Social Complaint Mechanism.
The Complaint is to be sent by email using this form and to: reclamation@afd.fr.
Or by post to:
Agence Française de Développement
Secrétariat du Dispositif de Gestion des Réclamations Environnementales et Sociales
5, Rue Roland Barthes
75598 Paris Cedex 12
France
Or be delivered by hand at the headquarters or the agency.
The FMO has established the Independent Complaints Mechanism, which ensures the right to be heard for Complainants who feel affected by an FMO-Financed Operation, to enable resolution of disputes and assist FMO in drawing lessons learned for current and future operations.
You may submit the complaint via e-mail: complaintsoffice@fmo.nl.
Or by mail/post to:
Complaints Office
Nederlandse Financierings-Maatschappij voor Ontwikkelingslanden
N.V. P.O. Box 93060
2509 AB, The Hague
The Netherlands
Or through the website online form.
The DEG has developed an Independent Complaints Mechanism, open to individuals, groups, communities, or other parties to make a complaint if they believe they are, or may be, negatively affected by a project financed or planned by DEG. If requested, DEG will not reveal the identity of the complainants to the project sponsor and will jointly agree with the complainants on the process for handling the complaint.
You may submit the complaint via the online form
Or by mail/post to:
Complaints Office
DEG – Deutsche Investitions- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH
PO Box 10 09 61
50449 Cologne
Germany
Or by email to complaintsoffice@deginvest.de. You can find more information here.
The Canadian Export Development Agency as put in place a Compliance Officer to address complaints alleging violations of the funded company’s declaration on social responsibilities, which includes business ethics, environmental issues, transparency, employee engagement and community investment. Any individual or group may submit a complaint to EDC’s Compliance Officer when they have been, or are likely to be, affected by EDC’s policies on public disclosure of information, environmental reviews, human rights, and business ethics.
You can send your complaint by post to:
Compliance Officer
Export Development Canada
151 O’Connor Street
Ottawa ON K1A 1K3
Canada
Or by email to complianceofficer@edc.ca
The DFC is a U.S. government agency that supports the private sector in development projects around the world. It has established the Office of Accountability to address environmental or social concerns and conflicts that emerge around DFC-supported projects, including environmental impacts, human rights, indigenous rights, and labour rights issues. The Office of Accountability provides an avenue for affected stakeholders (e.g., nearby communities and project workers) to raise such concerns and seek to have them addressed.
You can send your request by email to accountability@dfc.gov. You may fill out this form (Request Form for Affected Parties or Their Representatives) and send it as an attachment to an email to accountability@dfc.gov.
You can also post your complaint to:
Director, Office of Accountability
U.S. Development Finance Corporation
1100 New York Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20527
USA
The EFIC provides financial solutions and advice to Australian businesses and their overseas buyers. It has established the “Complaints Mechanism” to solve potential disputes out of the projects that it finances.
You can make a complaint online by using the respective online complaints form, by emailing your complaint to complaint@exportfinance.gov.au.
Or by post to:
Attention: Chief Risk Officer & General Counsel
Export Finance Australia
Level 10, 22 Pitt St.
Sydney, NSW 2000
Australia
The NEXI is the official export credit agency of Japan. It has developed the Office of the Examiner for the Guidelines on Environmental and Social Considerations in Trade Insurance, to hear complaints regarding violations of the Guidelines through an Objection Procedure.
You can file your request to the Examiner by post to:
Chiyoda First Building
5th Floor 3-8-1,
Nishikanda, Chiyoda-ku
Tokyo 101-8359
Japan Nippon Export and Investment Insurance
Or by email to: kankyosinsayaku@nexi.go.jp
The abuse that you suffered may be committed by a business that is linked to another country. This might take place when the abuse you suffered was committed by a business which is not headquartered in Sri Lanka or a Sri Lankan business which is the local Sri Lankan subsidiary of a foreign corporation.
In those cases, you should consider whether it would be feasible to seek redress from the courts of the respective foreign state, OECD National Contact Points or the United Nations Development Program.
The abuse that you suffered may be committed by a business that is linked to another country. This might take place when the abuse you suffered was committed by a business which is not headquartered in Sri Lanka or a Sri Lankan business which is the local Sri Lankan subsidiary of a foreign corporation.
In those cases, you should consider whether it would be feasible to seek redress from the courts of the respective foreign state.
This might be beneficial for your case because:
However, you should be aware that resorting to a foreign jurisdiction will be a long process. It will necessitate resources, including financial resources and human resources such as experienced domestic lawyers who can collaborate with foreign lawyers from the jurisdiction in question. NGOs are another key player to contact, as they can potentially recommend pro bono lawyers and institutions willing to fund a case.
Most cases never proceed to trial and are instead settled out of court.
You may face legal and evidentiary hurdles along the way. However, you should always keep in mind that victims can resort to a foreign jurisdiction to seek redress, despite the handicaps. Even if not remedied through the court process, this strategy often provides international coverage on the issues and has at times resulted in an out of court settlement in favour of the victims.
The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has 38 member states.
The member states of the OECD have adopted the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, which regulate the activities of corporations headquartered in the member states both within the state, but also abroad, in cases where those corporations conduct activities in other countries. They include guidelines on human rights, labour rights, and the environment.
Member governments and non-members that adhere to the OECD Declaration on International Investment and Multinational Enterprises (of which the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises are a component) are required to establish a national contact point (NCP).
NCP functions include promoting the guidelines, handling enquiries, and facilitating the resolution of problems arising from the non-observance of the guidelines. In this last function, the NCP receives “specific instance” complaints and provides a mediation process for the complainants, often civil society organisations or trade unions, to reach a settlement with the multinational enterprise.
Therefore, if you have suffered harm by the activities of a foreign corporation and this corporation is headquartered or operating from a country that has an active NCP, you can file a complaint (‘specific instance’) before that NCP.
You can find out which countries have NCPs, here.
Any individual or organisation with a legitimate interest in the matter can submit a case to an NCP regarding a company, operating in or from the country of the NCP, which has not observed the Guidelines.
The Guidelines are addressed by adherent countries to ‘enterprises operating in or from their territories’ which enables NCPs to handle cases involving companies headquartered in other countries.
Filing a case with an NCP is very easy. Many NCPs provide a form to do so on their website. NCPs may however have different requirements for the initial submission. To find out more about the specific requirements of an NCP, make sure to visit the NCP’s website where you will find all the information needed.
It is not necessary to be represented by a lawyer when filing a case to an NCP or when engaging in the specific instance process as a company. You can however seek legal representation and submit claims assisted by lawyers, NGOs, or trade unions.
Business and Industry Advisory Committee (BIAC), Trade Union Advisory Committee (TUAC) and OECD Watch are platforms of representative organisations that represent business, trade unions and civil society at the OECD, and may provide guidance or assistance in relation to specific instances.
No. As the NCP process is meant to be as accessible as possible, NCPs do not charge you when filing a case.
NCPs are not courts. Participation in the process is voluntary and the NCP does not have the authority to order any remedial measure.
What NCPs will do is offer their “good offices” to the parties and seek to facilitate an agreement between the submitter and the company through non-adversarial methods such as mediation or conciliation. Regardless of whether an agreement is reached, NCPs can make recommendations to the company with respect to the Guidelines. Some NCPs also make explicit determinations as to whether a company has observed the Guidelines or not in the case at hand.
Most NCPs also follow up after the conclusion of the case to verify that any agreement and/or recommendations have been implemented.
In practice, NCPs have been able to facilitate such remedies as monetary compensation, in-kind reparation, changes in company policy, etc.
Submitters of an NCP case should not be subject to undue pressures or adverse consequences. This was restated by the OECD Working Party on RBC in March 2020. If you fear retaliation, the NCPs can take measures to protect your identity in the process. Make sure to inform the NCP of your situation in such a case.
The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) develops programs in different parts of the world with the aim of eradicating poverty and reducing inequalities and exclusion. It has established two mechanisms to receive complaints related to its projects:
Achieving justice and remedy for the abuses that you suffered as a human rights defender working on business-related human rights abuses can be a lengthy and difficult process. It may require a combination of patience and strategy, and you may have to call on different resources to achieve your goal. A comprehensive approach may include using legal remedies together with other kinds of complementary strategies such as strategic campaigning, shareholder accountability strategies, grassroots mobilisation, coalition building or gaining media attention.
It can be overwhelming to think about these considerations right after an abuse has taken place. Before thinking about the strategies, you want to use, try to make sure you are both physically and mentally safe and strong.
Remember that you are not alone in this situation and that there are a range of organisations that can help you and provide you with immediate support in case of an emergency or financial, legal and psychological difficulties. See Resource Hub.
The first thing you may want to consider is building a strategic campaign. A strategic campaign aims to exert pressure on the different strategic relationships of a business or state actor. To develop a strategic campaign, you should carefully analyse your situation and decide which actions will have the most positive impact for your case.
For example, you will have to decide whether you want to deal with your case publicly or privately, loudly or quietly, in a manner that takes into account the political and other sensitivities that exist in your country. The purpose of the strategic campaign is for you to get a clear picture of the situation, the direction you want to take your case and the concrete actions you can attempt to take to achieve this result.
This whole process will be demanding on your resources and your mental and physical health so do not hesitate to reach out and ask for help from organisations that are used to dealing with similar cases! There is no shame in doing so and they can provide you with valuable expertise. See Resource Hub.
To build a strategic campaign you and your collaborators can follow these five steps:
1- Identify your objectives and overall goal: You can do this by asking yourself questions such as What do I want to happen? What do I hope to achieve?
Your overall goal will be the long term and general outcome that you want to achieve. To reach this goal you will need to identify smaller steps and specific milestones that need to take place, these will be your objectives.
! When deciding on your objectives, make sure that they are SMART:
2- Take the time to do a policy analysis and identify your audience: You can identify the policies and regulations that need to change, the key actions and stakeholders who can influence decisions and understand the overall political context that will influence your overall goal. You will further need to identify the stakeholders that can help you achieve your objectives. For example, who are the decision makers involved in the issue? What are the power dynamics at play? You should understand why and how each audience you approach can play a role in reaching your goal or can hinder it. Do not forget, when considering actors that could hinder your goal, to be as specific as possible and write down all details you can find on them including their names and functions.
! Note that if some corporate actors can hinder your goal, other business representatives might help you achieve it! Businesses do not all have the same policies and attitudes when it comes to the respect of human rights and the environment. By interacting with business representatives and industry groups you might find valuable allies that can provide you with support in a variety of ways including testifying on your behalf, paying for bail and fines, or speaking up on your behalf.
3- Identify your strengths, weaknesses and your message: It will be helpful for you to reflect on your internal strengths - skills, knowledge, resources, past experience - and weaknesses - missing networks, capacity for lobbying, contacts in the media or funding. Once you have identified these, you can search for opportunities that exist around you and will enable you to tackle your weaknesses and achieve your objectives. You should further consider the threats that could prevent you from achieving your objectives by asking yourself who are your opponents? Is there a negative political climate around your objective? Identifying them early will enable you to minimise the damage and safety risks they can present.
Once you have reflected on your strengths and weaknesses, you will need to identify what your audience needs to hear and present your message in a persuasive and appealing way. At their core, your messages should be the same, however, depending on the audience you will target, you will need to adapt the way they are framed. Most of the time, advocacy messages have two major components: (1) a calling for what is right and (2) a calling for the audience’s self-interest. You can find different methods to develop advocacy messages by using the key words “advocacy message” and “effective” on google.
4- Identify your tactics and activities: Depending on your situation and objectives, you will have to use different strategies and tactics to reach your goal. To choose the appropriate tactics for you to use, you can develop a ‘results chain’. The chain will start with your overall goal and outline the small steps you will need to take to get there. In your chain you can describe the assumptions you are making about the impact of the activities you plan on doing. This will help you reflect on your logic and might show you missing activities. It will further help you understand the kind of resources, be it financial or volunteers, that you will need to put your campaign into action. There are various organisations that you can reach out to for financial support. See Resource Hub.
A few examples of activities include one-to-one meetings with high level representatives, the organisation of workshops and conferences, the drafting of a letter to international civil servants, a mass participation event engaging members of the community, social media posts or petitions.
5- Monitor and Evaluate: Finally, you want to make sure that you are keeping track of the efforts you are putting into your campaign to ensure that they are working. You will also want to organise meetings to monitor the campaign and make sure it is going in the direction you want.
Grassroots mobilisation is about bringing together individuals - in your district, region, or community - to influence a specific outcome. It is one of the key elements in successful campaign strategies. Grassroots mobilisation can be highly effective, as we have seen with the #SaveAru movement, because it uses collective action at a local level to influence outcomes at the national level. When every member of the community is participating in ways that they can, and are equally responsible and invested in the cause, the movement is truly powered by collective leadership. The costs of the movement are further distributed between all members of the community and thereby become more affordable.
To build grassroots mobilisation, you and your collaborators can follow five simple steps:
1- Identify the cause you want to address and make a plan of action;
2- Find supporters and volunteers to join your campaign;
3- Reach out and partner with local organisations and community leaders;
4- Implement your plan of action; and
5- Regularly evaluate your progress.
! Do not forget that, when it comes to mobilising members of a community, listening and understanding is more important than influencing and persuading. Having several short conversations will be more efficient than a one-off long speech to a general audience!
To get started, you should identify the cause you want to address
(1). The problem that you want to tackle most probably has a root cause. For example, it can be the lack of respect for human rights and the environment by a company which operates in proximity to your village and has threatened you; the absence of legislation by the government to protect people defending the environment; or the inefficiency of local government officials to implement a law, among other potential root causes. You need to identify the root cause you want to tackle so that you can clearly define the actions and steps you want to take to resolve the issue. Defining the outcome, you are looking to achieve will also be crucial to give your movement a clear direction.
Once you have identified the cause you want to address, you can start creating awareness about your campaign and get interest from individuals in the community
(2). Communication will play a key role here and you can use different approaches such as door-to-door canvassing, face-to-face conversations, emails, phone calls or social media to reach as many community members as possible. Having a campaign website or a Facebook page can be a useful tool to speed up this process and will make you gain important visibility online! It will further constitute a good opportunity to start building the next step by building a list of potential partner organisations.
Using your website and the networks of members from the community you can approach like-minded local organisations and community leaders. See Resource Hub.
(3). To reach out to them you could offer to give a short presentation about your campaign during their events or simply provide your help during their rallies to get to know like-minded people and talk about your campaign. Usually, civil society organisations have dealt with or assisted defenders in similar contexts in the past. They can share their valuable experience with you, guide you on what to do, explain the law and your rights, guide you on where to find support and identify pro bono lawyers that can help you plead your case or provide support in building an advocacy campaign.
! You should not ignore community leaders! Community leaders can be valuable allies that you can collaborate with to convey important messages of your campaign. If a community leader endorses the changes and propositions you raise, they will be more likely to be accepted and followed by the community and your movement will gain traction. Examples of community leaders that can help you are religious leaders, local political office holders or village figureheads.
Once you have built a solid basis of supporters you can start implementing your plan of action
(4). You can take a variety of actions as part of your plan including rallies, outdoor events, in-house groups, training sessions, organising for a group of volunteers to exchange with the local representative or staging a demonstration. No matter the activity that you choose to conduct, the key to success will be having successful communication. You can keep your supporters up to date on actions conducted through SMS, WhatsApp, and encrypted apps such as Telegram and/or post your announcements for events on your campaign website and Facebook page. Do not forget to communicate with your organisers and volunteer team to make sure everyone has the same information including the date, time, and place of the events.
During your campaign, you can organise regular meetings with your supporters to evaluate the success of your actions
(5). This will enable you to reflect on what went well and what did not and give you avenues for improving your upcoming events. At the end of the campaign, it will also enable you to see if you have reached your objectives.
Reaching out to other organisations and talking about your case will give you the opportunity to build coalitions. A coalition is a temporary alliance of individuals, groups or organisations that want to achieve a common goal. Forming a coalition with other organisations that have similar values, interests, and goals as your own will allow you to combine your resources and thereby have more impact than if you acted alone. It can be of great help to shift the balance of power and increase the impact of each of your organisation's efforts. Actions taken by the coalition can be focused towards bringing attention to your and other human rights defender cases in the media, requesting for a motion filed by lawyers to be considered or request the international community to act.
To successfully build a coalition you need to take a series of steps.
Another complementary strategy for your case may be to gain visibility and attention by getting media coverage. Before deciding if you want to use this strategy, you should ask yourself whether you want your case to be publicly known and talked about or if you would rather go about, it quietly. Gaining media coverage can play a pivotal role in presenting your case, promoting it in public debate and positively shaping public opinion in your favour. However, this may expose you to further retaliation, as companies may use strategic lawsuits against public participation (see section on SLAPPs) to try to silence you. For example, the company could bring a defamation suit against you, the journalist who interviewed you and/or the organisation that published the article. Importantly, you must be careful that the journalist does not reveal your current location so as not to compromise your safety.
To attract media coverage, your story should be prepared in such a way as to catch the attention of readers. You can do this by highlighting why your organisation exists, how important your work is to society and by providing details about the abuse that you have suffered. If you can, try to link your story to an issue that is currently talked about in the public space as this will be more likely to interest the media. Finally, if you can show how your story affects other people and has an impact on wider society, this will increase the interest of newspapers.
Once your story is ready, you can use social media to promote it by publishing blog posts, Instagram stories, Facebook posts and/or tweets. This will enable you to gain public attention and establish your cause before getting traditional media interested in what you have to say.
If you want the attention of mainstream media, you can collaborate with other national and international organisations to contact reporters. You can reach journalists by email, through their social networks (such as LinkedIn, Facebook or Twitter) or through partner organisations. You will have a better chance of getting your interview request accepted if you choose journalists who are used to covering the same kind of story as yours.
! Be aware that journalists can receive a lot of requests so keep your emails short and to the point!
If you don't get a response to your first contact request, you can follow up by tweeting the reporter or trying to contact them by phone. Don't get discouraged as getting media attention can be a long process during which you may end up sending your story to twenty journalists before one responds.
When a journalist becomes interested in your story, they will most likely want to talk to you in person. To make sure you are well prepared for the interview, keep in mind three key points you want to make and practice answering questions with a colleague.
Once the interview is over, do not forget to thank the journalist for his or her time. Following the publication of the article, you can forward it to regional or national newspapers thereby gaining exposure and/or circulate it among your partner organisations.
Although business-related human rights abuses find corporate actors at the heart of the human rights abuses, you should not forget that businesses and industry groups do not all have the same policies, attitudes, and views when it comes to the respect for human rights and the environment.
You might want to look for allies in the private sector by reaching out to business representatives and industry groups and explain the issues you are facing. Private actors might become valuable allies who can provide you with support in a variety of ways including by testifying on your behalf, paying for bail and fines, or speaking up on your behalf.
Equally important is to make your case known at international level.
National and international non-governmental organisations are allies in your strategic campaign and have a fundamental role to play in channelling information to relevant institutions abroad. One of their main tasks is to submit the so-called shadow reports to international bodies or during the Universal Periodic Review Process. Those reports analyse how and if the government is realising human rights at the national level and provide the necessary background information to international organisations. In turn, if the shadow reports reveal information on serious and systematic violations of the rights protected by the conventions in the country concerned, international institutions can initiate inquiries or visits to the territory of a State Party. By making your case known to NGOs and INGOs, it can be included in their shadow report. Although this will not give you a tangible remedy, you will have added your brick to the wall of human rights in your country.
You can also bring international attention to your case through the various organisations worldwide that work to protect human rights defenders - including Frontline Defenders, Protect Defenders and Peace Brigades International. You can register your case with one of them, and they will identify the best ways to support you internationally. Be aware that they may publish something on their website or link you with other victims or experts worldwide. If your case is widely known, the offenders might hesitate to retaliate against you in the future. There are also many organisations that work on business and human rights issues that can share legal resources with you, both domestically and internationally. Most importantly, both kinds of organisations can direct you on where to find funding and donors to continue your legal case and to propose other resources necessary for your work as a human rights defender.
You can also contact political figures to draw attention to your case. For example, you can ask a foreign diplomat - by contacting the foreign ministry of the country in question or the embassy - to listen to your story, to come to your trial or simply to have a photo taken with you. This will show your abuser that your case is being taken seriously at the international level and may make them think carefully about retaliatory actions in the future.
If you are uncomfortable with contacting diplomats of foreign countries, you can contact international civil servants instead. International civil servants are not linked to a specific country but rather to an organisation. To contact them, you can look up the offices of OHCHR, UNDP or the ILO in your country. These organisations often organise informal events such as consultations and webinars during which you can have the opportunity to raise your concerns and build a support network.
Businesses often establish self-regulatory initiatives in the sector in which they operate, sometimes establishing industry-level grievance mechanisms. Those mechanisms aim to promote relevant human rights standards within a particular industry, as well as to provide a grievance mechanism for the victims.
In addition, businesses may participate in multi-stakeholder grievance initiatives along with governments, civil society, and other stakeholders. Those initiatives seek to facilitate dialogue among different stakeholder groups and address complaints in relation to the activities of participating businesses.
If your rights have been violated by a business, you can consider reporting the issue to any relevant industry or multi-stakeholder initiative, such as the ones below. The list is not exhaustive but indicates some of the main initiatives that contain a complaints avenue.
The UN Global Compact is a UN voluntary initiative which supports companies to “do business responsibly by aligning their strategies and operations everywhere with ten universally accepted principles in the areas of human rights, labour, environment and anti-corruption.” Various businesses participate in the Global Compact and commit to respecting its standards. You can bring an allegation of a human rights abuse against a business that participates in it, by sending a letter to Global Compact Office at info@unglobalcompact.org.
The UN Global Compact is more useful as a dialogue facilitation rather than as a complaint resolution mechanism.
More information is available here.
The Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative (‘EITI’) is a coalition of governments, companies, civil society groups, investors and international organisations which supports improved governance in resource-rich countries.
EITI Compliant countries are required to promote the minimum requirements set by EITI, and EITI Supporting companies are required to disclose information on their engagements with governments.
Grievances concerning abuses by states or businesses can be submitted in writing to the Chair requesting that the Members' Meeting considers a matter.
More information is available here.
The International Council on Mining and Metals is an industry body, consisting of various metal and mining companies. Corporate members commit to implementing several principles and performance expectations, including to respect human rights and the interests, cultures, customs and values of workers and communities affected by their activities.
If a mining or metal company, that participates to the ICMM, has acted in contravention of your human rights and this has harmed you, then you can consider filing a complaint with the Council.
The Council will monitor the responses by the company concerned and, in some circumstances, will launch their own investigation.
More information is available here.
The Ethical Trading Initiative is an alliance of companies, trade unions and NGOs promoting respect for workers’ rights. All corporate members of ETI agree to adopt the ETI Base Code of labour practice, which guarantees freely chosen working environments, freedom of association and the right to collective bargaining, safe and hygienic working conditions, prohibition of child labour, payment of living wages, non-excessive working hours, non-discrimination, regular employment, and prohibition of harsh and inhumane treatment.
ETI has developed a complaints procedure for alleged abuses of codes of labour practice in workplaces supplying ETI corporate members.
Reporting an abuse to the ETI is carried out through an ETI member and usually through a relevant trade union or a voluntary organisation. Therefore, you can approach a relevant organisation, report your situation, and ask them to act on it by sending a complaint to the concerned ETI corporate member, putting the ETI secretariat in copy (eti@eti.org.uk).
More information is available here.
The Fair Labor Association (FLA) is a multi-stakeholder initiative, which includes companies, universities, and civil society organisations, committed to protecting workers’ rights through adherence to international labour standards.
It has established a ‘Third Party Complaint’ procedure which allows any person, group, or organisation to report serious abuses of workers’ rights in facilities used by any company committed to FLA labour standards. Outcomes include reinstatement of unfairly dismissed workers with back pay and recognition of trade unions. Other examples are the establishment of training and education programs for management and workers and improved relations between workers and management at factories.
More information on how to submit a complaint here.
The Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) is an industry coalition dedicated to corporate social responsibility in global supply chains. The RBA has also set up the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) and the Responsible Labour Initiative (RLI).
Member companies are required to adhere to the RBA Code of Conduct, the RBA has a range of tools to promote accountability including requesting documentation proving compliance, requiring an internal audit, or removing the member from the RBA. If the company which has abused your rights is a member of the RBA, you can send a complaint about the abuse via the “worker voice platform” which features a worker survey tool, audit support, a mobile learning app, and a grievance reporting mechanism. Complaints can also be reported by members of the public via this form.
The Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights is a multi-stakeholder initiative, comprised of governments, non-governmental organisations and extractive companies that promote the implementation of a set of principles that guide companies on providing security for their operations while respecting human rights. Participants commit to conducting risk assessments and to ensuring that security provisions in extractive undertakings are consistent with human rights principles.
Consequently, if any of your rights have been violated by a business that participates in the scheme, you can raise the issue with a participating NGO, such as The Fund for Peace, Human Rights Watch, International Alert, LITE-Africa, New Nigeria Foundation, Pact, Partners for Democratic Change International, Partnership Africa Canada, Pax, Search for Common Ground. The NGO can then raise the issue with the members of the Voluntary Principles. However, a tangible remedy for your individual case should not be expected.
More information is available here Why implement the Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights: Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights.